On Jan 21, 2010, at 4:55 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> *shrug* I don't have a strong opinion about it, and it's pretty easy to change, if there's a consensus we should. I
havecertainly found over the years that perl warnings from some modules can be annoyingly verbose, which is probably
whythe original patch didn't make them have a higher level in Postgres. If this were a big issue we'd have surely heard
aboutit before now - there are plenty of plperl users out there.
Using elog(WARNING) certainly makes a lot more sense to me…
David