Re: JSON Patch for PostgreSQL - BSON Support?

"Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov> writes:
> Charles Pritchard <chuck@jumis.com> wrote:
>> Storing internally as BSON (if it holds up to its premise) would
>> mean more efficient traversal of internal objects in the future,
>> if we were to have JSON-related functions/selectors.
> How about the fact that not all JSON objects can be represented in
> BSON (if the JSON object has a very long string), and not all BSON
> objects can be represented in JSON (if the BSON object has an
> array).

Well, if it's not just a binary encoding of JSON, I think we can forget
about it ... certainly it won't work in the form I was visualizing.
        regards, tom lane