Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 03:12:24PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> The point is for the back branches to absorb pgindent-induced changes that
>> have already happened in HEAD, so I'm not sure what you're getting at.
> My point is uses of new typedefs names added in HEAD which are not
> typedefs in the back branches will be pgindent'ed differently than
> before, e.g. back branches use a variable 'aaa' which is not a typedef
> in back branches, but if 'aaa' becomes a typedef in HEAD, references to
> 'aaa' in back branches will be adjusted by pgindent.
Right, and that's what we want, because the corresponding uses of 'aaa'
as a variable will also have been changed in HEAD. The point of this
exercise is to ensure that otherwise-equivalent code is indented the same
in all branches.
regards, tom lane