Re: statement timeout vs dump/restore

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: statement timeout vs dump/restore
Дата
Msg-id 25117.1210109593@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: statement timeout vs dump/restore  (Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>)
Ответы Re: statement timeout vs dump/restore  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net> writes:
> ISTR being unconvinced by the pg_restore arguments, but as I think about it 
> some more, for someone to set statement_timeout on a production system, and 
> then have that be blindly overridden by any random pg_dump user seems a bit 
> unfair.  pg_dump is not only used as a backup tool, it is also used as a 
> general user tool (for example, pgadmin calls pg_dump if you want to see a 
> tables schema).

So?  In those usages, it's not going to run long enough to have a
statement_timeout problem anyway.

When there is a data dump involved, you still have to defend the
proposition that it's okay for pg_dump to deliver a bad dump if
statement_timeout hits it.  I can't accept that.
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Robert Treat
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: statement timeout vs dump/restore
Следующее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [GENERAL] psql \pset pager