Re: Query analyse

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Benjamin Jury
Тема Re: Query analyse
Дата
Msg-id 24DC688F52AAD611B60900096BB0B440015D83B4@chapar.mpuk.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Query analyse  (Elielson Fontanezi <ElielsonF@prodam.sp.gov.br>)
Список pgsql-general
It would apear the second query does not use the index.
!       Shared blocks:         88 read,          0 written, buffer hit rate
= 89.19
vs
!       Shared blocks:       7408 read,          0 written, buffer hit rate
= 13.23

You could create a second index which is based upon a function that does the
truncation...

Incidentally you can add a second parameter to trunc() to truncate to a set
number of decimal places, which would save some time instead of dividing and
multiplying. ( http://www.postgresql.org/docs/7.3/static/functions-math.html
)

-Ben.

-----Original Message-----
From: Elielson Fontanezi [mailto:ElielsonF@prodam.sp.gov.br]
Sent: 25 July 2003 14:08
To: pgsql-sql; pgsql-general
Subject: [GENERAL] Query analyse


Good morning!

    First of all, my envoronment is:
        Linux netlab142.prodam 2.4.8-26mdk #1 Sun Sep 23 17:06:39 CEST 2001
i686 unknown
        pg_ctl (PostgreSQL) 7.2.1

    I would like some suggestions on how to speed up a query.

    Both of the queries below are identical except that one of them use the
trunc function.

    You can see that the TRUNC function rise hardly up the query response
time in the second query.
    That shouldn´t be happen. Only because a trunc function?

    What can I be in that case?
    What does it happen?

    Sure, there are indexes:

CREATE INDEX idx_proposta_2 ON proposta USING btree (in_situacao_proposta);
CREATE INDEX idx_proposta_4 ON proposta USING btree (nr_proponente);

    And pa.nr_proponente is fk and op.nr_proponte is pk.

    These are the queries:

1o.  That is ok.

DEBUG:  query: select
   pa.nr_projeto,
   pa.dc_denom_projeto,
   pa.nr_proponente,
   pa.dc_coordenador,
   op.dc_proponente
   from proposta pa
   inner join orgao_proponente op
   on (pa.nr_proponente = op.nr_proponente)
   where pa.in_situacao_proposta <> 'E' ORDER BY 1 DESC;

DEBUG:  QUERY STATISTICS
! system usage stats:
!       0.015904 elapsed 0.000000 user 0.020000 system sec
!       [0.010000 user 0.020000 sys total]
!       0/0 [0/0] filesystem blocks in/out
!       143/42 [353/172] page faults/reclaims, 0 [0] swaps
!       0 [0] signals rcvd, 0/0 [0/0] messages rcvd/sent
!       0/0 [0/0] voluntary/involuntary context switches
! postgres usage stats:
!       Shared blocks:         88 read,          0 written, buffer hit rate
= 89.19
%
!       Local  blocks:          0 read,          0 written, buffer hit rate
= 0.00%
!       Direct blocks:          0 read,          0 written

2o. But I need to use the trunc function:

DEBUG:  query: select
   pa.nr_projeto,
   pa.dc_denom_projeto,
   pa.nr_proponente,
   pa.dc_coordenador,
   op.dc_proponente
   from proposta pa
   inner join orgao_proponente op
   on (trunc(pa.nr_proponente/100000,0)*100000 = op.nr_proponente)
   where pa.in_situacao_proposta <> 'E' ORDER BY 1 DESC;

DEBUG:  QUERY STATISTICS
! system usage stats:
!       104.665005 elapsed 10.090000 user 0.420000 system sec
!       [10.100000 user 0.420000 sys total]
!       0/0 [0/0] filesystem blocks in/out
!       141/50 [352/180] page faults/reclaims, 0 [0] swaps
!       0 [0] signals rcvd, 0/0 [0/0] messages rcvd/sent
!       0/0 [0/0] voluntary/involuntary context switches
! postgres usage stats:
!       Shared blocks:       7408 read,          0 written, buffer hit rate
= 13.23
%
!       Local  blocks:          0 read,          0 written, buffer hit rate
= 0.00%
!       Direct blocks:          0 read,          0 written

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Dmitry Tkach
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Query analyse
Следующее
От: Richard Welty
Дата:
Сообщение: 7.3.3 upgrade with RPMs on RH 8.0