Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Checkpointer starts before bgwriter to avoid missing fsync reque

Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com> writes:
> On 1 June 2012 14:59, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Ah. �Well, as long as the overflowed fsyncs do get handled on the
>> requesting side, I see no bug here. �No objection to changing the order
>> in which we launch the processes, but as Heikki says, it's not clear
>> that that is really going to make much difference.

> If I see those messages again, I guess you'll be right.

> If that happens I suggest just adding a short wait at bgwriter startup.

Why?  Surely we are not that concerned about performance during the
startup transient.  Also, it is very easy to imagine that adding a delay
would make startup performance worse not better anyway.
        regards, tom lane