Re: btree_gist (was: CommitFest progress - or lack thereof)

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: btree_gist (was: CommitFest progress - or lack thereof)
Дата
Msg-id 24431.1297547116@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: btree_gist (was: CommitFest progress - or lack thereof)  (Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>)
Ответы Re: btree_gist (was: CommitFest progress - or lack thereof)  (Oleg Bartunov <oleg@sai.msu.su>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com> writes:
> btree_gist is essentially required for exclusion constraints to be
> useful in a practical way.

> In fact, can you submit it for the next commitfest to be included in
> core? That would allow range types and exclusion constraints to be used
> out-of-the-box in 9.2.

> Only if you think it's reasonable to put it in core, of course. If
> extensions are easy enough to install, maybe that's not really
> necessary.

btree_gist is entirely unready to be included in core.
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2010-10/msg00104.php
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Kevin Grittner"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: SQL/MED - file_fdw
Следующее
От: Dimitri Fontaine
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Debian readline/libedit breakage