Re: btree_gist (was: CommitFest progress - or lack thereof)
От | Jeff Davis |
---|---|
Тема | Re: btree_gist (was: CommitFest progress - or lack thereof) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1297534430.27157.672.camel@jdavis обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: btree_gist (was: CommitFest progress - or lack thereof) (Oleg Bartunov <oleg@sai.msu.su>) |
Ответы |
Re: btree_gist (was: CommitFest progress - or lack thereof)
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, 2011-02-12 at 18:53 +0300, Oleg Bartunov wrote: > > It sure seems like > > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.0/static/btree-gist.html could be and > > should be improved, in general.. If this module is really still just a > > test bed for GiST, then perhaps it's not a big deal.. > > No, it's quite useful and used in many projects, since it's the only way > to create multicolumn gist indexes like (tsvector,date). +1 btree_gist is essentially required for exclusion constraints to be useful in a practical way. In fact, can you submit it for the next commitfest to be included in core? That would allow range types and exclusion constraints to be used out-of-the-box in 9.2. Only if you think it's reasonable to put it in core, of course. If extensions are easy enough to install, maybe that's not really necessary. Regards,Jeff Davis
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: