Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com> writes:
> I retract my earlier suggestion of doing HEAD different from
> REL9_5_STABLE, at least for the moment. My patch for pg_controldata
> related functions is going to impact all this anyway, so we might as
> well not fuss about it now.
Seems reasonable.
> Any objections to the attached?
Looks OK in a quick once-over.
regards, tom lane