On 8/14/19 10:45 AM, Rich Shepard wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Aug 2019, Adrian Klaver wrote:
>
>> So you have the tables in Postgres, correct?
>
> Adrian,
>
> Not yet. I have the schema extracted using mdb-schema.
>
>> I did something similar with the USDA Nutrient database(with notion of
>> making it a test dataset): https://ndb.nal.usda.gov/ndb/doc/index
>
> This is from streamnet.org. They're part of the Pacific States Marine
> Fisheries Commission and it's a database of all fish-related information
> within the Columbia River basin.
Have you looked at:
https://www.streamnet.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/StreamNetExchangeStandard2018-1.doc
>
>> Access allows you to define 'virtual' relationships that are not really
>> enforced as I found out when looking at the data. Good luck on getting
>> information, my experience is agencies(I have also dealt with USFWS) do
>> not respond to requests about their data. If you do get the information I
>> guessing you will have to create your own method of dealing with it.
>> Don't
>> count on the data being consistent.
>
> At the federal level cooperation is spotty. Several years ago I downloaded
> the International Taxonomic Identification System (ITIS) database (the
> internationally accepted list of names -- scientific and common -- for all
> animals (perhaps plants, too) in mysql format (I think that was the format)
> and my contact there asked for the postgres database when done. I sent him
> the dump_all output and he was happy. State level is more open.
>
> Regards,
>
> Rich
>
>
>
--
Adrian Klaver
adrian.klaver@aklaver.com