Re: Certification
От | Michael Meskes |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Certification |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 23709849.I7pqYYvXy1@feivel обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Certification (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>) |
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
> I think this should be a closed list run by the Linux Foundation. Why's that? I'm willing to put up a list we can use for discussion. > Because some members of the community have a conflict of interest, I'm > not certain we can have a certification endorsed by "the whole community". Depends on what you call "endorsed". Nobody expects us to say this is the one and only. > I would be willing to review the test questions (and suggest some), as > well as reviewing overall coverage. Ok, thanks. BTW we're not talking questions here, but tasks to be performed. > However, the first question we should have with this is "what problem > are we solving?" > > That is, are the EnterpriseDB/SRA/etc. certifications not good enough? At the very least they are not vendor neutral. > to make money off PostgreSQL. If there is a deficiency, we need to make > sure that an LF certification will address that specific deficiency. Again, by its very setup I think it solves the major problem. Michael -- Michael Meskes Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org) Meskes at (Debian|Postgresql) dot Org Jabber: michael.meskes at gmail dot com VfL Borussia! Força Barça! Go SF 49ers! Use Debian GNU/Linux, PostgreSQL
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: