Re: PostgreSQL Password Cracker
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: PostgreSQL Password Cracker |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 23571.1041642483@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: PostgreSQL Password Cracker (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: PostgreSQL Password Cracker
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> But it is a "sect1" in libpq. It should be a "sect1" somewhere that
> makes more sense.
> ...
> It doesn't belong in libpq, and it doesn't belong in the Programmer's
> Guide.
How could it not belong in libpq? But you are right that the
Programmer's Guide seems the wrong place for information that is
important to end-users.
Perhaps libpq needs to have a chapter in the User's Guide as well as a
chapter in the Programmer's Guide? Or maybe we could put the relevant
information into a reference page under PostgreSQL Client Applications
(titled something along the line of "common behavior of all libpq-based
client applications").
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: