On 23.06.22 20:21, Adrian Klaver wrote:
> On 6/23/22 10:11, Adrian Klaver wrote:
>> On 6/23/22 00:37, Tomas Pospisek wrote:
>>> On 22.06.22 22:18, Tomas Pospisek wrote:
>>>> On 22.06.22 21:25, Adrian Klaver wrote:
>>>>> On 6/22/22 12:17, Tomas Pospisek wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> So I used both pg_dump and pg_restore from the newer machine. Result
>>> is still the same. So I'll use Tom Lane's suggestion too and fix the
>>> 'UTF-8' spelling in the dump file:
>>
>> Not sure why that is necessary? Is seems this is low hanging fruit
>> that could dealt with by the equivalent of lower('en_US.UTF-8') =
>> lower('en_US.utf-8').
>
> Well that was clear as mud.
:-D
> My point was that I don't see why the end
> user should have to do this when it could be handled internally in the
> pg_restore code.
That would indeed be very friendly of pg_restore if it'd take that
little task off the user :-)
+1 of course :-)
*t