Re: test/modules/test_oat_hooks vs. debug_discard_caches=1

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: test/modules/test_oat_hooks vs. debug_discard_caches=1
Дата
Msg-id 2316565.1668827411@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: test/modules/test_oat_hooks vs. debug_discard_caches=1  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Ответы Re: test/modules/test_oat_hooks vs. debug_discard_caches=1
Список pgsql-hackers
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
> On 2022-11-18 15:55:34 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> We realized today [1] that it's been some time since the buildfarm
>> had any debug_discard_caches (nee CLOBBER_CACHE_ALWAYS) coverage.

> Do we know when it was covered last? I assume it's before the addition of
> test_oat_hooks in 90efa2f5565?

As far as that goes: some digging in the buildfarm DB says that avocet
last did a CCA run on 2021-10-22 and trilobite on 2021-10-24.  They
were then offline completely until 2022-02-10, and when they restarted
the runtimes were way too short to be CCA tests.

Seems like maybe we need a little more redundancy in this bunch of
buildfarm animals.

            regards, tom lane



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Peter Geoghegan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: New strategies for freezing, advancing relfrozenxid early
Следующее
От: Thomas Munro
Дата:
Сообщение: More efficient build farm animal wakeup?