Re: Bugtraq: Having Fun With PostgreSQL
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Bugtraq: Having Fun With PostgreSQL |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 2316.1182146291@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: Bugtraq: Having Fun With PostgreSQL ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Bugtraq: Having Fun With PostgreSQL
Re: Bugtraq: Having Fun With PostgreSQL Re: Bugtraq: Having Fun With PostgreSQL |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
"Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com> writes:
> Christopher Browne wrote:
>> That won't help; that would introduce the "embarrassment" of having a
>> known default password.
> No it wouldn't unless the packagers set it up to do that. My point is
> that when a packager (or source) runs initdb, it would prompt for the
> postgres user password.
Practically every existing packaging of PG tries to run initdb as a
hidden, behind-the-scenes, definitely not-interactive procedure.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: