Re: Bugtraq: Having Fun With PostgreSQL

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: Bugtraq: Having Fun With PostgreSQL
Дата
Msg-id 2316.1182146291@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Bugtraq: Having Fun With PostgreSQL  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
Ответы Re: Bugtraq: Having Fun With PostgreSQL  ("Magnus Hagander" <magnus@hagander.net>)
Re: Bugtraq: Having Fun With PostgreSQL  (Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim@CommandPrompt.com>)
Re: Bugtraq: Having Fun With PostgreSQL  (Jim Nasby <decibel@decibel.org>)
Список pgsql-hackers
"Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com> writes:
> Christopher Browne wrote:
>> That won't help; that would introduce the "embarrassment" of having a
>> known default password.

> No it wouldn't unless the packagers set it up to do that. My point is 
> that when a packager (or source) runs initdb, it would prompt for the 
> postgres user password.

Practically every existing packaging of PG tries to run initdb as a
hidden, behind-the-scenes, definitely not-interactive procedure.
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: ITAGAKI Takahiro
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Load Distributed Checkpoints, revised patch
Следующее
От: "Magnus Hagander"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Bugtraq: Having Fun With PostgreSQL