Re: Authentication problem
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Authentication problem |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 23119.1015432032@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Authentication problem (Dmitry Morozovsky <marck@rinet.ru>) |
Ответы |
Re: Authentication problem
|
Список | pgsql-admin |
Dmitry Morozovsky <marck@rinet.ru> writes: > There is no "fall-through" or "backup": if one record is chosen > and the authentication fails, the following records are not > considered. > Are there any plans to loose this restriction? No. I don't believe we could count on clients to respond to multiple authentication challenges of different types. > It would be very useful to use e.g. > local all ident admin > local sameuser ident sameuser > local all password passwd.user The "sameuser" part of this works now, since sameuser is a record matching constraint, not an authentication test. There has been some talk of adding a more flexible username-matching field to pg_hba (whereupon the file name would be inappropriate ;-)) but no one's really done any work on it. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления: