Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com> writes:
> I was tempted to back-patch this. The risk to back branch users seems
> negligible, and it would be convenient for me as a person who builds all
> branches. That reason is not good enough, so I plan not to back-patch. I
> feel like I might be missing a stronger reason to back-patch.
Hm, wouldn't it help reduce the cycle time for Windows buildfarm members?
That might still not be adequate reason, but it's an advantage beyond
time-saving for individual developers.
regards, tom lane