Re: [HACKERS] Function-manager redesign: second draft (long)

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Function-manager redesign: second draft (long)
Дата
Msg-id 22606.940946519@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] Function-manager redesign: second draft (long)  (Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] Function-manager redesign: second draft (long)
Re: [HACKERS] Function-manager redesign: second draft (long)
Список pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> Sounds good.  My only question is whether people need backward
> compatibility, and whether we can remove the compatiblity part of the
> interface and small overhead after 7.1 or later?

I think we could drop it after a decent interval, but I don't see any
reason to be in a hurry.  I do think that we'll get complaints if 7.0
doesn't have any backward compatibility for existing user functions.
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Fernando Schapachnik
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Neverending query on 6.5.2 over Solaris 2.5.1
Следующее
От: saad
Дата:
Сообщение: what the hell telnet is