Re: [HACKERS] Function-manager redesign: second draft (long)

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Bruce Momjian
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Function-manager redesign: second draft (long)
Дата
Msg-id 199910260525.BAA21896@candle.pha.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Function-manager redesign: second draft (long)  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] Function-manager redesign: second draft (long)
Re: [HACKERS] Function-manager redesign: second draft (long)
Список pgsql-hackers
> This is a followup to a message I wrote in June about reworking the fmgr
> interface.  I've had a couple of good ideas (I think ;-)) since then,
> but there are some parts of the proposal that still need work before
> implementation can begin.
> 
> I could particularly use some feedback from Jan and anyone else who's
> worked with function-call handlers: does this design eliminate the
> kluges that you've had to use in the past?  If not, what else is needed?

Sounds good.  My only question is whether people need backward
compatibility, and whether we can remove the compatiblity part of the
interface and small overhead after 7.1 or later?

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle maillist@candle.pha.pa.us            |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
 


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: System indexes are never unique indexes( was RE: [HACKERS] mdnblocksis an amazing time sink in huge relations)
Следующее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [ADMIN] Re: [HACKERS] RFC: Industrial-strength logging (longmessage)