Re: git: uh-oh
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: git: uh-oh |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 22529.1282325313@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | git: uh-oh (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: git: uh-oh
Re: git: uh-oh |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Max Bowsher <maxb@f2s.com> writes:
> The history that cvs2svn is aiming to represent here is this:
> 1) At the time of creation of the REL8_4_STABLE branch, plperl_opmask.pl
> did *not* exist.
> 2) Later, it was added to trunk.
> 3) Then, someone retroactively added the branch tag to the file, marking
> it as included in the REL8_4_STABLE branch. [This corresponds to the git
> changeset that Robert is questioning]
Uh, no. We have never "retroactively added" anything to any branch.
I don't know enough about the innards of CVS to know what its internal
representation of this sort of thing is, but all that actually happened
here was a "cvs add" and a "cvs commit" in REL8_4_STABLE long after the
branch occurred. We would like the git history to look like that too.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: