Re: Built-in binning functions

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: Built-in binning functions
Дата
Msg-id 22103.1409528923@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Built-in binning functions  (David G Johnston <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: Built-in binning functions  (David Johnston <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
David G Johnston <david.g.johnston@gmail.com> writes:
> Since "bucket" is the 'verb' here (in this specific case meaning "lookup the
> supplied value in the supplied bucket definition") and "width" is a modifier
> (the bucket specification describes an equal-width structure) I suggest
> "literal_bucket(val, array[])" such that the bucket is still the verb but
> now the modifier describes a structure that is literally provided.

It's a very considerable stretch to see "bucket" as a verb here :-).
Maybe that's why the SQL committee's choice of function name seems
so unnatural (to me anyway).

I was wondering about bucket_index(), ie "get the index of the bucket
this value falls into".  Or get_bucket(), or get_bucket_index() if you
like verbosity.
        regards, tom lane



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Built-in binning functions
Следующее
От: David Johnston
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Built-in binning functions