Re: Do we want SYNONYMS?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: Do we want SYNONYMS?
Дата
Msg-id 2186.1291669744@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Do we want SYNONYMS?  (Michael C Rosenstein <mcr@mdibl.org>)
Ответы Re: Do we want SYNONYMS?  (Michael C Rosenstein <mcr@mdibl.org>)
Re: Do we want SYNONYMS?  ("Mark Felder" <feld@feld.me>)
Список pgsql-general
Michael C Rosenstein <mcr@mdibl.org> writes:
>> What is "schema" in this context?

> Oracle "schema" == Postgres "database":  a collection of objects
> (tables, functions, triggers, views, etc) owned by a user.

That seems like a pretty unlikely equivalence.  What I'm afraid
you are really saying you want is cross-database synonyms (ie links
to objects in remote databases).  Which I'm pretty sure is not what
JD is offering to implement, though I think it is possible to do
in Oracle.

            regards, tom lane

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Do we want SYNONYMS?
Следующее
От: "Gauthier, Dave"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Do we want SYNONYMS?