Re: Do we want SYNONYMS?
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Do we want SYNONYMS? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 2186.1291669744@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: Do we want SYNONYMS? (Michael C Rosenstein <mcr@mdibl.org>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Do we want SYNONYMS?
Re: Do we want SYNONYMS? |
| Список | pgsql-general |
Michael C Rosenstein <mcr@mdibl.org> writes:
>> What is "schema" in this context?
> Oracle "schema" == Postgres "database": a collection of objects
> (tables, functions, triggers, views, etc) owned by a user.
That seems like a pretty unlikely equivalence. What I'm afraid
you are really saying you want is cross-database synonyms (ie links
to objects in remote databases). Which I'm pretty sure is not what
JD is offering to implement, though I think it is possible to do
in Oracle.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: