Re: BUG #1632: Several jailed PostgreSQL instances.

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: BUG #1632: Several jailed PostgreSQL instances.
Дата
Msg-id 2186.1114879352@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: BUG #1632: Several jailed PostgreSQL instances.  ("Nicolai Petri (lists)" <lists@petri.cc>)
Ответы Re: BUG #1632: Several jailed PostgreSQL instances.  (Achilleus Mantzios <achill@matrix.gatewaynet.com>)
Список pgsql-bugs
"Nicolai Petri (lists)" <lists@petri.cc> writes:
> It might still be a good idea for postgresql to be able to detect this
> collision without crashing each others backend or doing other weird stuff.

It tries --- see IpcSemaphoreCreate in src/backend/port/sysv_sema.c.
If the "jail" mechanism hides processes from each other but not
semaphore sets, then the attempted detection will fail.  I don't think
that's a Postgres bug.  The SysV IPC mechanism is defined to expose
process PIDs of processes accessing a shmem segment or sema set;
therefore you can't have a jail mechanism that separates PIDs but not
shmem/semas without fundamentally breaking the API.

Or this might just be a garden-variety kernel bug.  In any case I think
you need to be complaining to FreeBSD kernel hackers, not us.

            regards, tom lane

В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Jaime Casanova
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: BUG #1639: Problema re-instalacion
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Win1250 database under linux