Re: adminpack and pg_catalog

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: adminpack and pg_catalog
Дата
Msg-id 21739.1161407583@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: adminpack and pg_catalog  (Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com> writes:
> On Fri, 2006-10-20 at 22:59 +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> Nothing except initdb should add objects in pg_catalog.  AFAICS, 
>> adminpack doesn't have any special requirements, so it should behave 
>> like all other contrib modules.

> Okay. Are there any opinions on whether we should make this change to
> contrib/adminpack now (i.e. during the 8.2 beta), later (for 8.3), or
> not all at?

AFAIR the point of adminpack was to support pgAdmin, which expects those
functions to be in pg_catalog.  At some point we might as well just take
it out instead of whack it until it meets some arbitrary restrictions
and isn't at all backwards-compatible anymore.

(No, I don't find these arguments that it mustn't put anything in
pg_catalog to be very compelling ... if we seriously believed that,
we'd have arranged for the system to enforce it.)
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [PATCHES] zic with msvc
Следующее
От: "Magnus Hagander"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [PATCHES] zic with msvc