RE: new maintainer for the ODBC driver?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Magnus Hagander
Тема RE: new maintainer for the ODBC driver?
Дата
Msg-id 215896B6B5E1CF11BC5600805FFEA82103D982AA@sirius.edu.sollentuna.se
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на new maintainer for the ODBC driver?  (Kovacs Zoltan Sandor <tip@pc10.radnoti-szeged.sulinet.hu>)
Список pgsql-interfaces
Perhaps the amount of work required to maintain the ODBC driver would be
lower if it was changed to sit on top of the libpq library. It is a large
thing to move it there, but once it's done it should be easier for it to
follow the upgrades without requiring large work.

Disclaimer: I haven't checked the code out really much, so I can't say if
this is true :-)

Other than that, perhaps some kind of "test suite" that should be "checked
off" by somebody before each relese - not necessarily checked by the person
maintaining it every time?

//Magnus

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Byron Nikolaidis [mailto:byron.nikolaidis@home.com]
> Sent: den 23 oktober 2000 17:17
> To: Kovacs Zoltan Sandor; pgsql-interfaces@postgreSQL.org
> Cc: dpage@vale-housing.co.uk; lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu
> Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] new maintainer for the ODBC driver?
> 
> 
> 
> Whoever does do it, should have access to the 
> Windows/Microsoft side of
> things -- not just Visual C++/Studio so he/she can compile an 
> executable
> version of the driver,  but also the applications, such as 
> Access 2000,
> Borland <insert product here>, etc.    Since my old computer 
> is gone, I
> currently have none of the applications I need to do the job 
> any longer. :(
> 
> It is very important that most of the applications people are 
> using these
> days with the driver be available to the person maintaining 
> the driver so
> that all the crazy odbc behaviors can be tested. I know I 
> would rather not
> have to go out and buy an application software package just 
> to test it with
> the odbc driver ( BTW,  I did this in the past with Borland 
> c++ builder).
> 
> Also, it seems rather difficult to be maintaining a version 
> that works well
> with Unix and also works with Windows.
> 
> Any thoughts?
> 
> Byron
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Kovacs Zoltan Sandor <tip@pc10.radnoti-szeged.sulinet.hu>
> To: <pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org>
> Cc: <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk>; <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu>
> Sent: Monday, October 23, 2000 7:16 AM
> Subject: [INTERFACES] new maintainer for the ODBC driver?
> 
> 
> > > know about). Now that Byron is unable (I assume not unwilling) to
> > > contribute as he did, I think we need someone to take over
> > > responsibility or at least get heavily involved as soon 
> as possible.
> > >
> > > I would volunteer myself, but my C is isn't really up to 
> it and pgAdmin
> > > takes a fair bit of time... Anyone else?
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Dave.
> > The ODBC driver still seems to be an important part of 
> PostgreSQL. So I
> > really support your idea. Unfortunately I really have no 
> time for this and
> > I'm rather new to the driver and Postgres internal 
> communication. AFAIK
> > Thomas Lockhart offered his work in May but I don't think 
> he had enough
> > time to check what happened on the list since then.
> >
> > Regards, Zoltan
> >
> 


В списке pgsql-interfaces по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Thomas Lockhart
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: new maintainer for the ODBC driver?
Следующее
От: Jan Wieck
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] RE: Announcing PgSQL - a Python DB-API 2.0 compliant interface to PostgreSQLL