Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 3:28 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> or just
>> ... latency limit: 33/33 (100.000 %)
> Oh, yeah. That last one sounds good; no reason to print the same
> value more than once.
Sold; I'll go make it so.
regards, tom lane