Fabrízio de Royes Mello <fabriziomello@gmail.com> writes:
> On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 5:22 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 10:44 PM, Fabrízio de Royes Mello
>> <fabriziomello@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Wouldn't a better name be recovery_min_apply_delay?
>>> +1
>> Works for me.
> Done!!
Since there were no objections, and time is growing (very) short,
I'm going to go ahead and push this in. It looks safe enough for
a last-minute change.
regards, tom lane