Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> I assume that the datestyle has to be set to YMD for this to work as
> outlined above, right, and that 97-01-01 will throw an error unless the
> datestyle is YMD.
Right, no more heuristics (other than assuming YYYY-MM-DD if the first
field is written with four digits). With 2-digit fields, the field
order will be taken to be whatever datestyle says it is.
> Yes, second one is most recent version.
Thanks, I'll work from that.
regards, tom lane