Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> > I assume that the datestyle has to be set to YMD for this to work as
> > outlined above, right, and that 97-01-01 will throw an error unless the
> > datestyle is YMD.
>
> Right, no more heuristics (other than assuming YYYY-MM-DD if the first
> field is written with four digits). With 2-digit fields, the field
> order will be taken to be whatever datestyle says it is.
Great.
> > Yes, second one is most recent version.
>
> Thanks, I'll work from that.
Great.
Still working on the regression test failures.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073