Re: Two fixes for plpgsql.sgml

Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> Agreed. I couldn't find any value to that phrase and couldn't find better
> wording, so I removed it.  Patch attached and applied.

This is not an improvement.

The point of the original wording is that you have to say
    RETURNS SETOF sometype
you can't just say, eg,
    RETURNS SET

Your new wording would lead the reader to the assumption that he can
just declare a function as returning "set".

Please revert the change.

            regards, tom lane