Re: [JDBC] Re: How embarrassing: optimization of a one-shot query doesn't work

Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> If anyone squawks we could think about a
>> faster update ...

> That assumes that someone working on using the planner hooks will read
> this thread - which might be reasonable - I guess they number of likely
> users is fairly small. But if they might miss it then it would be best
> to fix it ASAP, ISTM.

Well, it's not like we have never before changed internal APIs in a
minor update.  (There have been security-related cases where we gave
*zero* notice of such changes.)  Nor am I willing to surrender the
option to do so again.  If there's somebody out there with a real
problem with this change, they need to speak up.

            regards, tom lane