Re: PITR potentially broken in 9.2
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: PITR potentially broken in 9.2 |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20764.1354667748@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: PITR potentially broken in 9.2 (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: PITR potentially broken in 9.2
Re: PITR potentially broken in 9.2 Re: PITR potentially broken in 9.2 |
| Список | pgsql-bugs |
I wrote:
> So apparently this is something we broke since Nov 18. Don't know what
> yet --- any thoughts?
Further experimentation shows that reverting commit
ffc3172e4e3caee0327a7e4126b5e7a3c8a1c8cf makes it work. So there's
something wrong/incomplete about that fix.
This is a bit urgent since we now have to consider whether to withdraw
9.2.2 and issue a hasty 9.2.3. Do we have a regression here since
9.2.1, and if so how bad is it?
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: