Re: WAL and O_DIRECT
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: WAL and O_DIRECT |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20588.1431616292@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | WAL and O_DIRECT (Ravi Krishna <s.ravikrishna@aim.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: WAL and O_DIRECT
|
| Список | pgsql-admin |
Ravi Krishna <s.ravikrishna@aim.com> writes:
> Why is O_DIRECT not used, despite the documentation mentioning otherwise?
You've not shown us all your settings, but this comment in xlog.c might
explain it:
* Optimize writes by bypassing kernel cache with O_DIRECT when using
* O_SYNC/O_FSYNC and O_DSYNC. But only if archiving and streaming are
* disabled, otherwise the archive command or walsender process will read
* the WAL soon after writing it, which is guaranteed to cause a physical
* read if we bypassed the kernel cache. We also skip the
* posix_fadvise(POSIX_FADV_DONTNEED) call in XLogFileClose() for the same
* reason.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления: