Re: pg_verify_checksums failure with hash indexes
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: pg_verify_checksums failure with hash indexes |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20470.1536120960@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: pg_verify_checksums failure with hash indexes (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: pg_verify_checksums failure with hash indexes
Re: pg_verify_checksums failure with hash indexes |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> writes:
> Does anybody else have any idea on how can we write a test for
> non-default block size or if we already have anything similar?
Build with a non-default BLCKSZ and see if the regression tests pass.
There's no way that a build with BLCKSZ x can run any tests for
BLCKSZ y.
Note that you can expect some plan variations from a different BLCKSZ,
so there'd be at least a few "failures" in the regression tests, which'd
require manual inspection. Otherwise this could be delegated to a
buildfarm animal using a nonstandard BLCKSZ.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: