Re: Extensions, this time with a patch
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Extensions, this time with a patch |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20336.1287503130@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: Extensions, this time with a patch (Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri@2ndQuadrant.fr>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Extensions, this time with a patch
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri@2ndQuadrant.fr> writes:
> Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes:
>> Only if the script is intentionally noisy. The right fix here is
>> probably to bump up the min message level while running the script.
> You mean doing that from the SQL script itself (using SET) or in the
> pg_execute_from_file() code? My guess is the former, but...
You could argue that either way I guess. The script knows what it
needs, but OTOH just about every extension there is will probably
be generating useless NOTICEs unless something is done, so maybe
the extension management code should take care of it for them.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: