Re: Add RESPECT/IGNORE NULLS and FROM FIRST/LAST options
От | Tatsuo Ishii |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Add RESPECT/IGNORE NULLS and FROM FIRST/LAST options |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20251006.085133.920304905412132984.ishii@postgresql.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Add RESPECT/IGNORE NULLS and FROM FIRST/LAST options (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Thank you for the report! > Coverity is not very happy with this patch. > It's complaining that the result of window_gettupleslot > is not checked, which seems valid: > > 1503 { > 1504 if (fetch_tuple) >>>> CID 1666587: Error handling issues (CHECKED_RETURN) >>>> Calling "window_gettupleslot" without checking return value (as is done elsewhere 8 out of 9 times). > 1505 window_gettupleslot(winobj, pos, slot); > 1506 if (!are_peers(winstate, slot, winstate->ss.ss_ScanTupleSlot)) > 1507 return -1; Yes, I forgot to check the return value of window_gettupleslot. > and also that WinGetFuncArgInPartition is dereferencing > a possibly-null "isout" pointer at several places, including > >>>> Dereferencing null pointer "isout". > 3806 if (*isout) /* out of partition? */ > >>>> Dereferencing null pointer "isout". > 3817 if (!*isout && set_mark) > 3818 WinSetMarkPosition(winobj, abs_pos); > >>>> Dereferencing null pointer "isout". > 3817 if (!*isout && set_mark) > 3818 WinSetMarkPosition(winobj, abs_pos); > > The latter complaints seem to be because some places in > WinGetFuncArgInPartition check for nullness of that pointer > and some do not. That looks like at least a latent bug > to me. Agreed. Attached is a patch to fix the issue. Best regards, -- Tatsuo Ishii SRA OSS K.K. English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en/ Japanese:http://www.sraoss.co.jp
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: