Re: Add RESPECT/IGNORE NULLS and FROM FIRST/LAST options
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Add RESPECT/IGNORE NULLS and FROM FIRST/LAST options |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1686755.1759679957@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Add RESPECT/IGNORE NULLS and FROM FIRST/LAST options (Tatsuo Ishii <ishii@postgresql.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: Add RESPECT/IGNORE NULLS and FROM FIRST/LAST options
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tatsuo Ishii <ishii@postgresql.org> writes: > I have just pushed the patch (plus patches for syntax.sgml and > sql_features.txt. They were missued after I splitted the patch). Coverity is not very happy with this patch. It's complaining that the result of window_gettupleslot is not checked, which seems valid: 1503 { 1504 if (fetch_tuple) >>> CID 1666587: Error handling issues (CHECKED_RETURN) >>> Calling "window_gettupleslot" without checking return value (as is done elsewhere 8 out of 9 times). 1505 window_gettupleslot(winobj, pos, slot); 1506 if (!are_peers(winstate, slot, winstate->ss.ss_ScanTupleSlot)) 1507 return -1; and also that WinGetFuncArgInPartition is dereferencing a possibly-null "isout" pointer at several places, including >>> Dereferencing null pointer "isout". 3806 if (*isout) /* out of partition? */ >>> Dereferencing null pointer "isout". 3817 if (!*isout && set_mark) 3818 WinSetMarkPosition(winobj, abs_pos); >>> Dereferencing null pointer "isout". 3817 if (!*isout && set_mark) 3818 WinSetMarkPosition(winobj, abs_pos); The latter complaints seem to be because some places in WinGetFuncArgInPartition check for nullness of that pointer and some do not. That looks like at least a latent bug to me. If it isn't, the function's comment needs to be expanded to say when it's legal to pass isout == NULL. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: