Re: Pg_repack
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Pg_repack |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 202408121548.x5qz5npcikiw@alvherre.pgsql обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Pg_repack (Sathish Reddy <sathishreddy.postgresql@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Pg_repack
|
Список | pgsql-admin |
On 2024-Aug-12, Sathish Reddy wrote: > Hi > We have configure pg_repack on database.when we ran pg_repak it is using > temporary table on repack once repack done it is going to swap temporary > table to original .on these case it is genarate huse wal files and it > getting size increase be end . > We need help on these instead of using temporary table can we use unlog > table on reduce these wal case. I bet you'll find that pg_squeeze gives you better characteristics on those aspects. In any case, it's better if you can find a way to avoid running either of these tools in a regular manner, and instead treat them as if they were an emergency solution only, and rely on a better configured autovacuum to avoid having to schedule them regularly. -- Álvaro Herrera 48°01'N 7°57'E — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления: