At Wed, 6 Mar 2024 11:34:29 +0100, Alexander Kukushkin <cyberdemn@gmail.com> wrote in
> Hmm, I think you meant to use wal_segment_size, because 0x100000 is just
> 1MB. As a result, currently it works for you by accident.
Oh, I once saw the fix work, but seems not to be working after some
point. The new issue was a corruption of received WAL records on the
first standby, and it may be related to the setting.
> > Thus, I managed to reproduce precisely the same situation as you
> > described utilizing your script with modifications and some core
> > tweaks, and with the change above, I saw that the behavior was
> > fixed. However, for reasons unclear to me, it shows another issue, and
> > I am running out of time and need more caffeine. I'll continue
> > investigating this tomorrow.
> >
>
> Thank you for spending your time on it!
You're welcome, but I aplogize for the delay in the work..
regards.
--
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center