Re: introduce dynamic shared memory registry
| От | Nathan Bossart |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: introduce dynamic shared memory registry |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20240108171848.GB2611898@nathanxps13 обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: introduce dynamic shared memory registry (Amul Sul <sulamul@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: introduce dynamic shared memory registry
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Jan 08, 2024 at 11:13:42AM +0530, Amul Sul wrote: > +void * > +dsm_registry_init_or_attach(const char *key, size_t size, > > I think the name could be simple as dsm_registry_init() like we use > elsewhere e.g. ShmemInitHash() which doesn't say attach explicitly. That seems reasonable to me. > Similarly, I think dshash_find_or_insert() can be as simple as > dshash_search() and > accept HASHACTION like hash_search(). I'm not totally sure what you mean here. If you mean changing the dshash API, I'd argue that's a topic for another thread. -- Nathan Bossart Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: