Re: pg_stat_get_backend_subxact() and backend IDs?
| От | Nathan Bossart |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: pg_stat_get_backend_subxact() and backend IDs? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20230829164655.GA2138073@nathanxps13 обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: pg_stat_get_backend_subxact() and backend IDs? (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>) |
| Ответы |
Re: pg_stat_get_backend_subxact() and backend IDs?
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Aug 28, 2023 at 10:53:52AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> I understand that this is not a fantastic naming, but renaming
> pgstat_fetch_stat_local_beentry() to something like
> pgstat_fetch_stat_local_beentry_by_{index|position}_id() would make
> the difference much easier to grasp, and we should avoid the use of
> "beid" when we refer to the *position/index ID* in
> localBackendStatusTable, because it is not a BackendId at all, just a
> position in the local array.
This was my first reaction [0]. I was concerned about renaming the
exported functions so close to release, so I was suggesting that we hold
off on that part until v17. If there isn't a concern with renaming these
functions in v16, I can proceed with something more like v2.
[0] https://postgr.es/m/20230824161913.GA1394441%40nathanxps13.lan
--
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: