Re: [BUG] pg_dump does not properly deal with BEGIN ATOMIC function

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Alvaro Herrera
Тема Re: [BUG] pg_dump does not properly deal with BEGIN ATOMIC function
Дата
Msg-id 20230613102756.q2dv4uvxz4slkw4j@alvherre.pgsql
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [BUG] pg_dump does not properly deal with BEGIN ATOMIC function  (Morris de Oryx <morrisdeoryx@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: [BUG] pg_dump does not properly deal with BEGIN ATOMIC function
Список pgsql-hackers
On 2023-Jun-13, Morris de Oryx wrote:

> Quick follow-up: I've heard back from AWS regarding applying Tom Lane's
> patch. Nope. RDS releases numbered versions, nothing else.

Sounds like a reasonable policy to me.

> As Postgres is now at 15.8/15.3 in the wild and on 15.7/15.3 on RDS,
> I'm guessing that the patch won't be available until 14.9/15.4.
> 
> Am I right in thinking that this patch will be integrated into 14.9/15.4,

Yes.  The commits got into Postgres on June 4th, and 14.8 and 15.3 where
stamped on May 8th.  So the fixes will be in 14.9 and 15.4 in August,
per https://www.postgresql.org/developer/roadmap/

> if they are released?

No "if" about this, unless everybody here is hit by ICBMs.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera        Breisgau, Deutschland  —  https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: John Naylor
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [PATCH] Add loongarch native checksum implementation.
Следующее
От: John Naylor
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [PATCH] Using named captures in Catalog::ParseHeader()