Re: Patroni vs pgpool II

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tatsuo Ishii
Тема Re: Patroni vs pgpool II
Дата
Msg-id 20230405.163826.1094418722086264919.t-ishii@sranhm.sra.co.jp
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Patroni vs pgpool II  (Alexander Kukushkin <cyberdemn@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: Patroni vs pgpool II  (Inzamam Shafiq <inzamam.shafiq@hotmail.com>)
Список pgsql-general
> BUT, even if there is a solution that parses queries to make a decision it
> I would not recommend anyone to use it unless all consequences are
> understood.
> Specifically, not every read-only query could be salefy sent to a replica,
> because they could be lagging behind the primary.
> Only application (developers) could decide whether for a specific query
> they could afford slightly outdated results. Most of the popular
> application frameworks support configuring two connection strings for this
> purpose.

I think Pgpool-II users well understand the effect of replication
lagging because I've never heard complains like "hey, why my query
result is sometimes outdated?"

Moreover Pgpool-II provides many load balancing features depending on
user's needs. For example users can:

- just turn off load balancing
- turn off load balancing only for specific application name
- turn off load balancing only for specific database
- turn off load balancing if current transaction includes write query

Best reagards,
--
Tatsuo Ishii
SRA OSS LLC
English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en/
Japanese:http://www.sraoss.co.jp



В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Alexander Kukushkin
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Patroni vs pgpool II
Следующее
От: Inzamam Shafiq
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Patroni vs pgpool II