Hi,
On 2023-01-22 17:34:52 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> I spent some more time staring at this and came up with what seems like
> a workable patch, based on the idea that what we want to indent is
> specifically initialization expressions.
That's awesome. Thanks for doing that.
> Proposed patch for pg_bsd_indent attached. I've also attached a diff
> representing the delta between what current pg_bsd_indent wants to do
> to HEAD and what this would do. All the changes it wants to make look
> good, although I can't say whether there are other places it's failing
> to change that we'd like it to.
I think it's a significant improvement, even if it turns out that there's
other cases it misses.
Greetings,
Andres Freund