Re: index not used for bigint without explicit cast

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Noah Misch
Тема Re: index not used for bigint without explicit cast
Дата
Msg-id 20230119053047.GA1295127@rfd.leadboat.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: index not used for bigint without explicit cast  ("Sam.Mesh" <Sam.Mesh@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: index not used for bigint without explicit cast
Список pgsql-bugs
On Wed, Jan 18, 2023 at 01:43:43PM -0800, Sam.Mesh wrote:
> Peter, thank you for clarification.
> Could you please double check the following reasoning based on
> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/btree-behavior.html?
> - Index search by bigint column requires conversion of limiting
> expressions to bigint type.
> - Conversion from number(19,0) to bigint may cause overflow.
> - So, index search is not possible.

Essentially, yes.  This is a query planner limitation, not a fundamental
property of the search problem.  "bigintcol = '5.1'::numeric" is equivalent to
"bigintcol <> bigintcol" or "CASE WHEN bigintcol IS NULL THEN NULL ELSE false
END".  In contexts that don't distinguish "false" from NULL, it's equivalent
to constant "false".  Those observations apply to any search value such that
'search_value'::numeric::bigint::numeric <> 'search_value'::numeric does not
return true, including overflow-error cases.  Like many datatype-specific
tricks, the planner isn't aware at this time.



В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: PG Bug reporting form
Дата:
Сообщение: BUG #17753: pg_dump --if-exists bug
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: index not used for bigint without explicit cast