On Sat, Jan 14, 2023 at 10:40:40AM +0100, Gilles Darold wrote:
> Nathan, please confirm and fix the status of this commit fest entry.
Yes, thank you for taking care of this. I believe the only changes in this
patch that didn't make it into ff9618e are the following documentation
adjustments. I've added Jeff to get his thoughts.
diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/ref/cluster.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/ref/cluster.sgml
index b9f2acb1de..29f0f1fd90 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/ref/cluster.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/ref/cluster.sgml
@@ -67,7 +67,8 @@ CLUSTER [VERBOSE]
</para>
<para>
- <command>CLUSTER</command> without any parameter reclusters all the
+ <command>CLUSTER</command> without a
+ <replaceable class="parameter">table_name</replaceable> reclusters all the
previously-clustered tables in the current database that the calling user
has privileges for. This form of <command>CLUSTER</command> cannot be
executed inside a transaction block.
@@ -211,7 +212,8 @@ CLUSTER [VERBOSE]
<para>
Clustering a partitioned table clusters each of its partitions using the
partition of the specified partitioned index. When clustering a partitioned
- table, the index may not be omitted.
+ table, the index may not be omitted. <command>CLUSTER</command> on a
+ partitioned table cannot be executed inside a transaction block.
</para>
</refsect1>
--
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com