Re: A doubt about a newly added errdetail
| От | Kyotaro Horiguchi |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: A doubt about a newly added errdetail |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20220928.150034.1325913962801104491.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: A doubt about a newly added errdetail (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>) |
| Ответы |
Re: A doubt about a newly added errdetail
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
At Tue, 27 Sep 2022 12:19:35 +0200, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> wrote in
> Yeah, since you're changing another word in that line, it's ok to move
> the parameter line off-string. (If you were only changing the parameter
> to %s and there was no message duplication, I would reject the patch as
> useless.)
I'm fine with that. By the way, related to the area, I found the
following error messages.
> errmsg("publication \"%s\" is defined as FOR ALL TABLES",
> NameStr(pubform->pubname)),
> errdetail("Schemas cannot be added to or dropped from FOR ALL TABLES publications.")));
It looks tome that the errmsg and errordetail are reversed. Isn't the following order common?
> errmsg("schemas cannot be added to or dropped from publication \"%s\".",
> NameStr(pubform->pubname)),
> errdetail("The publication is defined as FOR ALL TABLES.")));
regards.
--
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: