Re: Functions 'is_publishable_class' and 'is_publishable_relation' should stay together.

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Alvaro Herrera
Тема Re: Functions 'is_publishable_class' and 'is_publishable_relation' should stay together.
Дата
Msg-id 20220729095900.kemsantarx4klz5r@alvherre.pgsql
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Functions 'is_publishable_class' and 'is_publishable_relation' should stay together.  (Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: Functions 'is_publishable_class' and 'is_publishable_relation' should stay together.  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 2022-Jul-29, Peter Smith wrote:

> On Fri, Jul 29, 2022 at 7:36 PM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> wrote:
> >
> > I don't object to doing this, but I think these two functions should
> > stay together nonetheless.
> 
> If you believe there is still a problem after applying the patch
> please explicitly name what function(s) you think should be moved.

Well, I checked the commit and the functions I was talking about look OK
now.  However, looking again, pg_relation_is_publishable is in the wrong
place (should be right below is_publishable_relaton), and I wonder why
aren't get_publication_oid and get_publication_name in lsyscache.c.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera        Breisgau, Deutschland  —  https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Peter Smith
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Functions 'is_publishable_class' and 'is_publishable_relation' should stay together.
Следующее
От: Amit Kapila
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [PATCH] Reuse Workers and Replication Slots during Logical Replication