Re: Time to remove unparenthesized syntax for VACUUM?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Noah Misch
Тема Re: Time to remove unparenthesized syntax for VACUUM?
Дата
Msg-id 20220702014553.GB2301877@rfd.leadboat.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Time to remove unparenthesized syntax for VACUUM?  (Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Jul 01, 2022 at 03:13:16PM -0700, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 01, 2022 at 03:05:55PM -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> > On 2022-07-01 14:56:42 -0700, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> >> The unparenthesized syntax for VACUUM has been marked deprecated since v9.1
> >> (ad44d50).  Should it be removed in v16?  If not, should we start emitting
> >> WARNINGs when it is used?
> > 
> > What would we gain? ISTM that the number of scripts and typing habits that'd
> > be broken would vastly exceed the benefit.
> 
> Beyond removing a few lines from gram.y and vacuum.sgml, probably not much.
> If it isn't going to be removed, IMO we should consider removing the
> deprecation notice in the docs.

Deprecation doesn't imply eventual removal.  java.io.StringBufferInputStream
has been deprecated for 25 years.  One should not expect it or the old VACUUM
syntax to go away.



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Noah Misch
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: First draft of the PG 15 release notes
Следующее
От: Michael Paquier
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: pg15b2: large objects lost on upgrade