Re: Time to remove unparenthesized syntax for VACUUM?
От | Nathan Bossart |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Time to remove unparenthesized syntax for VACUUM? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20220701221316.GB624998@nathanxps13 обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Time to remove unparenthesized syntax for VACUUM? (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>) |
Ответы |
Re: Time to remove unparenthesized syntax for VACUUM?
Re: Time to remove unparenthesized syntax for VACUUM? |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Jul 01, 2022 at 03:05:55PM -0700, Andres Freund wrote: > On 2022-07-01 14:56:42 -0700, Nathan Bossart wrote: >> The unparenthesized syntax for VACUUM has been marked deprecated since v9.1 >> (ad44d50). Should it be removed in v16? If not, should we start emitting >> WARNINGs when it is used? > > What would we gain? ISTM that the number of scripts and typing habits that'd > be broken would vastly exceed the benefit. Beyond removing a few lines from gram.y and vacuum.sgml, probably not much. If it isn't going to be removed, IMO we should consider removing the deprecation notice in the docs. -- Nathan Bossart Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: